Often
times with many issues and topics we find ourselves intensely committed to
creating change. However, even in spite of our best efforts and
intentions, many times we fall short. Millions of Americans vow every
December 31st that "starting tomorrow" they'll get in shape, lose
weight, quit smoking, and scores of other various commitments. Many
people stay staunchly devoted towards their pledges for weeks, months, yet
rarely permanently.
Why
is it that so often we fail to make the changes we commit to? When we allow our commitments to fail, it is
usually due in large part to competing commitments that we unknowingly have
stronger allegiances to. In the case of
New Year’s resolutions, we may have competing commitments to not embarrass
ourselves through failure, commitments of time that get in the way, or
commitments of self satisfaction that end up being too much to overcome. Sometimes this may be conscious or
subconscious. The key in overcoming
these competing commitments is to become conscious of our competing commitments
and to assess why the complimentary assumptions aren’t necessarily relevant and
can be overcome.
In
my first blog post I detailed my desire to research the possibility of and
potentially implement a green roof at my employers main manufacturing
facility. As part of the process to
garner the change necessary to implement this commitment, I’ve gathered data,
researched the costs and benefits of the project, and begun to put together a
presentation to pitch the idea to the leadership in my organization. Despite the progress I’ve made on the project
to date, I’ve hit a road block and have somewhat stalled currently.
I’ve
realized that many people in my organization do not share the same
environmental standards and goals for sustainability that I do. Because of this, I’ve also come to realize
competing commitments of my own that are preventing my progress in moving
forward on the green roof implementation.
On an informal level, I’ve discussed the project with certain leadership
members of my organization and have received subtle resistance to the ideas for
the project. Because of this, I
currently hold the assumptions that others within my organizations leadership
may also hold resistant opinions. Due to
these assumptions I understand that I hold a competing commitment with my fear
in wasting my political capital within my organization if my idea is rejected.
Revealing
my competing commitment and big assumptions may serve to help me in my work
going forward. By identifying these
issues, I may better be able to see the missteps of the commitment to the
competition. By being aware of these
assumptions and alternate commitments, it helps to start to identify measures
that may allow me to overcome fears associated with the assumptions.
In
efforts to move past this road block, I plan to foster thought partnership
through active listening. I plan to try
to once again meet informally with the individual who was resistant to my idea
for change. My plan is to ask what
reservations they may have towards my change initiative and find out all of the
potential issues that they believe may not be in the best interest of the
organization. After actively listening
to the individuals issues, I’ll relay back to them what I heard from them to
ensure we are on the same page and then after the meeting I’ll put together the
list of issues and begin to work towards a solution to address each. Fully understanding these issues is the key
to finding measures that will help me to overcome the fears associated with my
competing commitments and will help me to help others move past their
assumptions that hold them back from change as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment